>>>7) Continuation of BILINGUALISM - English and French - as applicable in Canada today.
>>
>>This one, I am surprised by. What exactly is the rational for this?
>
>Survival of our language maybe? (I'm talking about french, of course...)
>
>I would go further since a lot of Americans speak spanish (specially in the south), English, French and Spanish.

It's interesting to me how one has to be careful in how one phrases things. Both you and TomW, and possibly others (I have more to read) took thing differently than I intended it.
My intention was to say that BILINGUALISM would have to stay in law/regulation as-is FOR the absorbed Canadian "state(s)". I was NOT intending to push bilingualism on any other state OR the US Feds.