>>By the way... at least here (in Canada) the term "non-profit" does not mean UNsalaried people and no money in the bank. Many "non-profits" have staff with large salaries and have expenses in the millions of dollars along with nice fat bank accounts.
>
>That may or could be the situation of that association then.
Sure it could! It is even possible that any company personnel (Microsoft's or others) that are dedicated by a company to work on "non-profits" tasks become tax deductions for the company! Some call that having your cake and eating it too but others accept it as standard business practise.
My view is that a company providing staffing help to a non-profit that is totally unrelated to its own business is doing a GOOD THING and deserves any credit (including tax breaks) that it can get. Doing the same for a related non-profit should be viewed as immoral and illegal and I question the validity of creating the "non-profit" in the first place.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only