No, its a DBF. For practice's sake, the remote DBF is actually a FoxPro DBF; I am trying to get the forms and programs working with that scenario, as we will be upgrading the DBs to SQL as we get closer to implementation. I checked for insert triggers, default values, etc on the remote DB - nothing. I set up a dummy DB to test this problem, and had no problem, and so it is something on my original DBF in FoxPro that is causing this, not my technique. This remote DBF does have relationships established in the original DB, but there are no RI rules that go with it.

I forwarded "You know you're a geek when..." to two of my co-workers; both returned the list catagorized, in descending order of applicibility, with notations, and forwarded it on to family members.

>>Yep, did that already. All fields are marked as updateable.
>
>OK. Is your remote source a view also?
>
>>By the way, visited your site and really enjoyed the humor.
>
>Thanks. It's really ugly, but we were trying to get content first. Then we ran out of time. I plan on re-vamping it soon.
>
>Scot.