>>I guess that could be included. My main concern, because it is where it hits me all the time, is "whitespace" (and borders I suppose, visible or not).
>>But the fact of the matter is that if "Large Fonts" (and choice of proportion) is to be offered as an option, then it should handle it CLEANLY. The current handling is decidedly unclean.
>
>I think what's going on here is that the non-scaling fonts are a backward compatibility issue, that is, Windows has to continue to allow them because they were there originally. My guess it that Microsoft would be really happy to eliminate all non-scaling fonts and then the problem would go away.
>
>As for your Word problem, I don't think it's the same issue. FWIW, I exchange Word documents with lots of people all the time. I operate all my machines with large fonts. I do see differences in how tables lay out, but never thought to attribute that to large fonts. If it is a large fonts issue, I'd ascribe it to a bug in Word, not in Windows, unless you're seeing the same behavior in a variety of applications.

Maybe MS could solve this by making "Large Fonts" the default < s >


>
>Tamar