>>A quality discussion requires that those involved have commitment. Without commitment people will not give serious attention by will.
>
>We have a great amount, if not tremedous amount, of quality discussion here since 1996 and no specific agreement have been reach between member. This is mostly related to a great community and fine like that.
Michel, I'm asking for a category especcially for those who like fundamental discussions. I think that such a category can prevent flame-wars in the other categories.
>>A quality discussion requires that those involved have enough time. Without available time, even if there’s enough commitment, people will not be able to give serious attention.
>
>I've seen great answers over the years within just a small set of words giving within a small set of minutes. I again do not understand this comment.
Sure there were and are plenty of great short answers. But I'm not talking about answers to questions here. I'm not asking for yet another category that answers questions. I think that the current categories are excellent for that purpose. I'm asking for a category especcially for those who like fundamental discussions.
>I've read the rest of your message and I really don't understand anything in it. It's not clear as to what you would like to obtain. The purposes of the messages area on UT is about a messages area context and UT excels in it. If you're looking for high tech drop down technical content filtered entirely with only related items structured from A to B, etc. then what you'd probably want is to look or write some articles. On that, something else is coming in early 2003 but I can't tell more on it. However, as far as the messages area goes, it it pretty well structured for what it is suppose to do and deliver. We have a great community and it responds extremely well within this structure.
Michel, I'm not proposing yet another category that deals with questions. I'm proposing a category for those who like fundamental discussions. With that in mind, please reread my original message.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
