>[snip]
>Peter - in case both of you (You and Vlad) missed it -
>I was agreeing with what you said in your original post. I was agreeing without reservation.
>
>Now onward to the solution. EEK!! ACK! Phhffffffffffft...
>Can't please everyone. Know that. The tongue in cheek stuffs and things that don't fall into 'answering the question' - I KNOW they will not disappear - and I do not feel, really, that they should.
>
>BUT - you original post made me think, and I WONDER if it might be possible to EDIT the title(s) on a reply/response and still keep the threaded backlink. Probably have to ask Michel if it's possible without messing up too much inner workings / hidden mechanisms ...
Editing the title of the whole thread? I know that UT is able to edit the title of the whole thread and will do so to correct certain misspellings or misleading words.
Or do you want to be able to edit the title of a branch of the thread? In that case, a modification of the forum and category should also be possible. In that way it's possible to have the following sequence:
1 Someone posts a question.
2 One or more people answer.
3 One or more people have doubts about aspects of an answer and start a discussion.
4 If the discussion becomes somewhat more complicated ('fundamental'), the Forum/Category/Title (FCT) are reconsidered. ( Proposal for the FC-part: VFP/Fundamental Discussions )
5 The discussion is continued in the other FCT. The backlink is kept intact.
IMO, nice idea!
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
