Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
>My preference would have been along the lines of reporting the potential problem of ANSI comaptibility in a SYS(3054) message or such BUT otherwise leaving either as valid within VFP. That way no code would have been 'broken' and implementation of VFP8 could happen unimpeded with plans to later address the ANSI issues.
I understand your position, but I think the Fox team thought it was more important to prevent us from coding this wrong in the future than to protect our older code. Without blowing my NDA, I think I can say that the right approach was discussed at length and the general consensus was to do it the way it ended up.
Tamar
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement