>The VFP 7.0 EULA contained the same basic info but it was simply clarified in more detail for VFP 8.0. The VFP 7.0 EULA says...
>
>A SOFTWARE PRODUCT labeled as an upgrade replaces and/or supplements the product that formed the basis for your eligibility for the upgrade.
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
Right, but my reading of 8.0 is that the "supplements" is no longer the case. Instead, it's only "replace."
This seems to me to be a pretty big change.
So far, on these threads, it seems like there are two camps: the "this is a huge change and problem" group, and the "why is everyone making such a big deal out of this?" group. I am firmly in the former group! It seems as if I take EULAs more seriously than most folks, but isn't this what a company like Microsoft would want -- for us to take this seriously?
Is there a legal contact at Microsoft that we could contact who could clarify the policy with some authority?
Thanks.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. - Bertrand Russell