OK, ok, ok...

I know the title was not truly relevent, and you were "coerced" into reading it because it was not clear what the question was. For that I apologize, for adding a humorous note to an otherwise bland and repetitive litany of questions I cannot apologize. I will however in the future try to do both.

Regarding etiquette, I do not believe I was rude, crude or otherwise irresponsible to the other members of this group. I may have not followed protocol, but I do not believe I offended anyone other than you. And if this is true, I apologize to you for offending your board sensibilities.

Respectfully

Glenn

>George,
>>Sergey,
>>
>>I know you're trying to be as helpful as possible, but there's a difference between someone who has been hanging around here as long as Glenn has and a newbie. While I'll agree, whole-heartedly, that a meaningful title to a post is helpful in trying (on our end) to figure out if we can help, the regulars here, will, most of the time, do that.
>
>Yes, there's a big difference. Newbie may not know proper etiquette for posting. What excuse Glenn has for breaking it?
>
>>My point is that we shouldn't be the "Thread Title Police".
>
>I've no idea what you're accusing me of. Can you clarify, please?
>
>I think that most, if not all, realize that succinctly stating the problem in the title is far more likely to bring a quick response than otherwise. However, having been doing this for over 20 years, and knowing the pressures of deadlines, sometimes we all can't say anything but, "Help!" While it might not be the most descriptive title, people will read the thread, and help if they can.
>
>You're totaly missing my point. Meaningless or irrelevant message title may not have any effect on how it will be answerd. However it has a huge negative effect when you do a search. For example, can tell me what thread with title "It must be a magic" is about? You cannot because there's no info relevant to the message itself in this title.