>OK, ok, ok...
>
>I know the title was not truly relevent, and you were "coerced" into reading it because it was not clear what the question was. For that I apologize, for adding a humorous note to an otherwise bland and repetitive litany of questions I cannot apologize. I will however in the future try to do both.
>
>Regarding etiquette, I do not believe I was rude, crude or otherwise irresponsible to the other members of this group. I may have not followed protocol, but I do not believe I offended anyone other than you. And if this is true, I apologize to you for offending your board sensibilities.
>
>Respectfully
>
Hi Glenn,

You didn't offend me in any way so there's no need to aplogize. And I do like your titles when I read your messages. The problem arise when they come out in the search result because there is no way to tell what they are about w/o reading messages itself.
I'm sorry if I was to harsh, it wasn't my intention.