>> And the arguing of Frederic Steczycki is fallable (it's sophism, one big fallacy, using deceptive arguments).
>
>and what about "pro war" arguing?
That too is a fallable argument. Because, even if pro-war people use fallable arguments, that doesn't give you the 'right' to use fallable arguments also. It only gives you the right to try to prove the fallability of those pro-war arguments.
>
>>... asking them not to demonstrate anti-war.
>
>If everyboby could do that... in both direction. Too late Peter <s>
The point is that all those anti-war demonstrations are bad for the morale of the Americans and British soldiers, and are 'good' for the morale of the Iraqi soldiers. This will have a negative impact on the development of the war: more people will gonna die on both sides. Mark my words!
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
