Raj,
I use a different method to pack tables. I use tables with 200 fields of which 190 are ´memo´. I got the code from an article in the FoxAdvisor. I works like a charm. I can send you the code (with all credits to it´s creator) if you want.
Ron
>Table contains 140,000 records - (2.11 GB)
>
>When table has 101,000 records - (701 MB)
>
>Only for an additional 32,000 records additional table size increased (1.44 GB)
>
>Now the total size is 2.11 GB.
>
>
>Could you please tell me why is the table growing in its size so fast for only 32,000 records it went up with an additional 1.44 GB.
>
>Thank you very much.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only