So, if the oppressed aren't strong enough to overcome Saddam themselves, too bad? I believe they did try that by themselves after the Gulf War, and Saddam killed many of them in retaliation. I guess they must not have wanted freedom bad enough, huh?

>>
>>Still waiting to hear your plan.
>Chris;
>
>It is commendable to have a plan (better or worse) to eradicate despots like SH. That is not the point.
>The point is that the oppressed ones (citizens of that affected country) and NOBODY else has the right to think up (design, invent) and apply that “get rid of” plan as happened in several occasions (Spain, Chile, Argentina, and lots of countries in the South Hemisphere) with different results.
>Otherwise all those “good intentions” have inevitably the new and contradictory label of “Anarchy For Freedom” And please, do not tell me: “Sorry sir UN rules so you better shut up and follow the crowd…until we say UN is not useful anymore and remember if you are not with us you are against us (poor Switzerland)” and NEVER tell me: “Must break some eggs to make an omelet” Eat coral calcium you smarty…(do not get this personally but generally).
>
>After the WWII, these actions (military intervention) became “legal” and usual so nowadays nobody (almost) gives a damn about it… Want to “liberate” some country? Go ahead while I enjoying my house, my car, my girl ;), and my pets!. Everything it’s ok if they don’t bother me….
>
>The truth is that most people forget the unquestionable fact: “7 años de vacas gordas y 7 años de vacas flacas”. Something like: “7 years of healthy cattle and 7 years of unwell cattle”. Therefore, we better be prepared for the second “7 years” era.
>
>So get a “liberation” plan and set it up in your country. BTW, this reminds me Luke 6:41: “And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” I’m not a religious/believer at all but this phrase fits good anyway.