>I'm not sure, who you're referring here besides you and that post was >almost a month ago. I agree, that it was not nice, though I don't remember >right now, what exactly I wrote... I'm sorry for that post...

I'm not talking about me at all! This has nothing to do with me.
I'm simply giving information taken directly from the ceo of the organization. He was referring to numbers of people that you had upset and I'm not one of them at all. I responded to you as to how I felt and then forgot about it. I've responded to this thread besause it has been totally unfair to a decent organiztion.


>Also I don't know, what were exact motives of restoring me... It could be, >that this campaign played a role or because I kept creating new accounts >and answered lots of threads...

He was not even aware of your attempt to discredit tek-tips with your posts here on the UT so that could not have played a part in it at all. Again, I know this as I have spoken to him directly.

He restored you as a token of good will.... too bad you are not able to even consider that possibility. They have no desire to keep anyone from their forums, however, they also will not let anyone keep things a mess either.

>I received a message from another member, who told me, that one of the >reason was my mentioning UT in half of my posts.

Is the "other member" in charge?
Does the "other member" own tek-tips?