I responded to the first part of your message, and missed the second part.
That second part (13.2) looks a lot like the Java license wording that Sun demands. I wonder if Borland, likely being required to use such a wording in their Java Builder product, simply added it to their general license agreement.
Alan
>
>
>4.5 ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS APPLICABLE TO UPGRADES
>
>If you have purchased an upgrade version of the
>Product, it constitutes a single product with the copy
>of the Product that you upgraded. This means that,
>although you may have two sets of Product media, you
>still have only one license. Therefore, you may not
>transfer the original copy of the Product to any other
>party.
>
>
>
>That's it.
>
>This part is interesting though:
>
>
>13.2 Hazardous Uses. The Product is not intended for
> use, and you may not use or allow others to use the
> Product, in connection with any application
> requiring fail-safe performance such as the
> operation of nuclear power facilities, air traffic
> control or navigation systems, weapons control
> systems, life support systems, or any other system
> whose failure could lead to injury, death,
> environmental damage or mass destruction. You agree
> that Borland will have no liability of any nature,
> and you are solely responsible, for any expense,
> loss, injury or damage incurred as a result of such
> use of the Product.
>
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only