Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
>>If you use the FOR clause then ALL clause is not needed. FOR does an implicit ALL in all scope statements.
>
>Ok, I missed the first part where he wanted to replace multiple records.
It was hard to tell from Juan's question exactly what he wanted to do. Your reply was completely correct but I added the scope in case Juan wanted also to find those records that had the @field in it as well.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement