> I hate to be an ingrate but I would like to see more done to promote this product!

If you're going to bring this up again, why not add something to the discussion?

Why do you think that the money is better spent on marketing a product that you have already bought into, and not making VFP a more solid, robust tool?

What will marketing VFP accomplish? Do you really expect people to use VFP over .NET or Java? Isn't there a point on the curve where spending more money does not mean more results? Why would we push that point to the determent of VFP's feature set and service releases?

Note, that I have nothing against you or anyone (including Microsoft) for wanting VFP promoted. But you did bring it up again, so I'm assuming that you can shed some light against the questions that we've already asked.