I knew what you meant, Steve, but only wanted to make a point of the notion that .NET's "objective" is to be the best but it has a way to go yet.
That people pick the path that is best for them is indisputable and I should have been more careful in my own reply.


>Jim,
>
>I was trying to choose my words carefully, maybe I wasn't careful enough. When making personal decisions, don't people try to choose the path that is best for them? It may or may not turn out to be the best, but isn't that the goal?
>
>I say this in defense of those who have chosen that path (the .NET path), presumably they believe it to be best, or at least a good path...yet other people question their motivation.
>
>>>
>>But Steve... why does it have to be "best path"?... what's wrong with "another path" or "another option" or another tool"????
>>
>>It still seems to me that .NET may be the best path some day. Until then it really is just another path.