>David,
>
>'&&' is documented in Fox 2.6 help as I pointed out in my previous post.
>Anyway, is '&&' is implemented or not can be verified w/o help file. In Fox 2.6 the following line throws 'syntax error'. Separating '&' eliminates the error.

* Syntax error
>lcText = "abs&&"
>* No errors
>lcText = "abs&" + "&"
>

>

same results in Fox2.5

>
>
>>Sergey,
>>
>>I don't have 2.x available to test. But &~ will work equally well as an end of line comment in that version (as well as in VFP8) because of the way the parser works. Unless && is documented as an end-of-line comment marker explicitly in the help file it doesn't count.
>>
>>>I belive that '&&' goes back to the dbase II. Anyway, I tested it in Fox 2.6a before posting and there's excerpt from FoxPro 2.6 help