>>No, that's not what I said... I said it was one of the reasons that could be given for not releasing an SP. And, it has been used in the past.
>
>I never said you said *anything* specifically. I said you "once argued along the lines" and you certainly did! Stating "it was one of the reasons that could be given" (above) *confirms* that.
>
>*You* came up with this updating different codebase stuff, not me. Sometimes, when you take an all-knowing and prophetic stance, it comes back and bites you on the arse <s>.

Not at all, because I stated "could", not "will". "Could" includes the possiblity of some doubt. "will" indicates an absolute. Prophets have always use an "absolute" wording.