>Not at all, because I stated "could", not "will". "Could" includes the possiblity of some doubt. "will" indicates an absolute. Prophets have always use an "absolute" wording.

No Craig. You are suffering from a touch of "selective memory". See Thread #786118, Message #786182. This is what you really did say :-

"This alone won't justify an SP. MS must determine how many users are affected, is there a workaround, how many resources are required to fix it, etc. Remember...at this point, anything fixed in an SP must be fixed twice. Once in the SP and once in the Europa code base."

The word "could" is not even mentioned. The word "must" certainly is mentioned. You have stated an absolute ... "anything fixed in an SP must be fixed twice. Once in the SP and once in the Europa code base."

I think my original statement in this thread that you "once argued along the lines" is a slightly better recollection than yours is. You didn't say "could" at all - I think you would have been better accepting what I said, rather than *proving* that you didn't actually say what you *now* say you said (if you can work that one out) <s>.

Do you still want to argue this point?