>
>No Craig. You are suffering from a touch of "selective memory". See Thread #786118, Message #786182. This is what you really did say :-
>
>"This alone won't justify an SP. MS must determine how many users are affected, is there a workaround, how many resources are required to fix it, etc. Remember...at this point, anything fixed in an SP must be fixed twice. Once in the SP and once in the Europa code base."
>
>The word "could" is not even mentioned. The word "must" certainly is mentioned. You have stated an absolute ... "anything fixed in an SP must be fixed twice. Once in the SP and once in the Europa code base."

Craig is stating the obvious: The service pack fixes must also be included in the next version. I don'nt understand what the fuss is about.