Hi Dan,
Nope, not yet.
Neither rebuilding the indexes (using COPY TO PRODUCTION FOR ! DELETED()), nor running the app on the file server itself made a significant difference to responsiveness.
Still open to suggestions.
Cheers,
Andrew
>Did you get this fixed?
>
>>Hi Folks,
>>
>>I have a client with an old FPD 2.6 app with 4 (main) tables of between 200k and 500k records each. The data are on a WinNT WS "server" and the clients run FPD in a Win98 Window.
>>
>>In the past couple of weeks, data access times have more than quadrupled (the size of the tables hasn't changed significantly). Issuing
>>
USE g:\data\table1
>>SET ORDER TO 1
>>GO TOP
>>SKIP 100000
>>
>>is still going about 10 minutes later.
>>
>>The problem seems to be of the same magnitude from all of the workstations.
>>
>>Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Andrew
If we were to introduce Visual FoxBase+, would we be able to work from the dotNet Prompt?
From Top 22 Developer Responses to defects in Software
2. "It’s not a bug, it’s a feature."
1. "I thought I fixed that."
All my FoxTalk and other articles are available on my
web site.
Unless specifically identified otherwise, anthing posted here is purely my opinion and may or may not reflect the policies or practices of Microsoft.
