>>>Not to be rude to anyone but you didn't miss squat. I thought it was a total waste of time.
>>
>>That's been my impression of any chat I've ever attended, which is why I skipped this one.
>
>I got there when it finished but I read the log. Total waste of time would seem correct. So should'nt we make sure that something like that does'nt happen in the future?
>
>Who's to blame? What is to blame?
>
>Some basic principles. This could have been defined as an informal reunion. So perhaps the persons in charge of that reunion are to blame because they lost control of it. But did they ever control it?
>
>They should have defined the main topics and define maximum time for each of these topics. This should have been defined before the chat session.
>
>I don't want to blame those that initiated that reunion but before you schedule an event like that you should be available through it all. Don't leave before it finishes. It looks impolite <bg>. Why schedule this if you don't have the time?
>
>That event should'nt have been the place to try to solve problems that some exposed. It was not the time for that. Those in control should have made that clear.

I think we should try to take this as constructive critizism. John Koziol, is wanting to get a regular Fox Team chat session worked out.

My thoughts on the chat; it was handled like most first meetings are handled. Just an open forum, trying to get a feel for turn out, and content desires. A few issues got addressed. No one attending was real prepared to ask questions either.

I know that because of your Post, I have walked away with a few idea's to use in relation to the User Group I organize.

I'm looking forward to more gatherings.