>
You know John, I'm at the point of frustration with you. No matter what anyone says positive about VFP, you must shoot them down.
>

Not so. You basically stated that it as certainty that there will be a VFP 10 and 11. I asked how you knew that. You responded with how did I know it would not happen. That is not shooting you down. Rather, it was asking you how you knew that.

>
I'm just waiting for the first time you misstate something in a legal document for a client and another attorney eats you for lunch.
>

So this is a personal thing with you.

>
I can show you simple mistakes that lawyers with years of experience have made that first year law students shouldn't make.
>

And this has what to do with the point? Are you saying you made a mistake when you stated matter of factly that there will be a VFP 10 and 11? If so - just say that you mis-spoke and move on. There is no need to get into irrelevant personal attacks.

>
As for MS plans beyond Europa, when has MS ever announced plans for VFP beyond version .Next?
>

Precisely my point as to how you can state so matter of factly that there will be a VFP 11 - much less a 10.


>
Oh.. btw.. I'm so fed up with the attitude and tone in your replies that this is the last response I'm sending to you. You can reply all you want, but response is not coming. I'm tired of it all and it is no longer worth my time.
>

OK then - do you feel better getting that off your chest?