Al,

There was no requirement whatsoever to include "proof" as you call it. First, I knew that Steve had admitted to doing it to Rod in an email - but that was not my call to bring that up. That was Rod's call - and he did that. Second, more than a few people did see what I wrote - and did notice that it was gone. In fact, Steve was noted as being the last editor of the topic when my stuff disappeared.

Al - you asked for proof - and you got it. Your "timing" requirement is completely beside the point.


>
As a real simple exercise, could you please point out to me any proof you provided in your message footer (in the first post I made to this thread)?
>