>Just because that is your perception - that alone does not make it reasonable. You think you are that good that you can infer some sort of hidden intent on my part.

I'm not discussing if it is or it is not reasonable, just said what you wrote can lead to that perception and no, I'm not that good as I'm not that stupid too.

About hidden intents, you'd make a favor to all of us explaining your real intents other than bashing over VFP and those developers using it when any other "new technology" comes to the scene.

>But what if it was a VFP success story? That would be OK - right???? Then it would not be so cheap and not so much "marketing slime". The ethics around here are pretty situational.

Now you are playing "that good" guy, you're inferring "that would be OK" based on what? Did I say something that led you to have that "perception"?

What really hurts you in these discussions for you to get so passionate? Why don't you just forget VFP, its related forums and the unethical guys that attend them? Some "hidden" reason? I wonder...