>>Micro$oft at it again - this time in Sweeden.....
>
>
>It is a trademark infringment case. Are you saying that MS does not have the right to protect its Windows Trademark?

If the statement on the web site is correct, then the courts in the US have indicated more than once that there is no trademark infringement. Not that that should dictate how the rest of the world should see things, but it ought to at least be seen as a good hint of the merits of the case.

>
>Ask yourself why the linux vendor decided to name their software "Lindows".
>
>Not that I am rendering a judgment on this case - but ask yourself whether it is right for other companies to engnage in unfair competition against MS.