>>Huh?? Not everyone here is proficient in C#, or .Net.
>
>The C# code you posted certainly did not need a "proficient" C# developer to understand it and it didn't utilise the .NET framework to any particular extent.
>
>>What is your point?
>
>To be honest Kev, I thought you were taking the mick.

Why would I take the mick?

>Your average VFP developer could easily suss out the C# code you posted whether they had previously seen any flavour of "C" or not.

Maybe, maybe not, do you speak for the entire VFP developer population?

>For a moment, it looked like you were "high" on the elitism of writing a bit of console code in a language that had the letter "C" in it <s>.

Thanks a lot, I actually prefer writing something cool in VFP, a language I'm more familiar with.

>IMHO, probably way easier for most VFP developers to understand than the more so-called RAD oriented VB.net.

I don't think there's alot in that argument, C# is definitely clearer, but the differences are easily noticable.

I'm not sure what has made you direct your responses at me and not the exercise, but if you want to make a worthy contribution to the post, you may want to change your tune.

Kev