>John: Isn't Jet somehow involved, technically, with SQL Server?? As in part of the engine? Just a question.
No. SQL Server and Jet are different.
>I think what was meant by this comment was that if it works and works well in Fox, why move it???
Agreed. Moving something for the sake of moving something is stupid.
>I'm liking this 3-tier architecture you've espoused before more and more :)
Cool
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only