>Thanks... I get it, but I was looking more for the second
>child's record(s) tucking neatly below the corresponding
>first child's record. (No additional columns for the fields
>of the second child). Pardon me for being difficult; your
>suggestion should meet the functional requirements.
>Thanks again.
>- Kerwan
Then try treeview control although initialization is extremely slow. Another alternative is GridInGrid or separate grids arranged as needed.
Cetin