Thanks... I get it, but I was looking more for the second
child's record(s) tucking neatly below the corresponding
first child's record. (No additional columns for the fields
of the second child). Pardon me for being difficult; your
suggestion should meet the functional requirements.
Thanks again.
- Kerwan
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only