In some countries, the human form is considered a work of art. Only in amerika do people confuse sex with a nudity. Only in amerika, killing and maiming is okay for children, but nudity is not.

I didn't see the super bowl and rarely watch US news - but JJ has a bod shaped by god! Why not? Elmer Fudd can kill wabits - Chuck Norris can kill anyone with dark skin - but JJ's booby is a no-no?

Hmmmm! I prefer the boobies:-)

>I watched the superbowl and it was clearly visible as well as the little star pasty she had stuck on as well. I didn't appreciate it one bit considering my 12 year old daughter was watching with me. She gasped and asked me "Can they do that on tv?" Who knows how many younger children were watching with their parents. She insists that it was all intentional or else Janet Jackson would not have been wearing a start sticker... My feelings are pretty simple: keep it off the tv and definitely keep it off of primetime or earlier programs. I really don't think the superbowl was rated for it (the vchip stuff) to allow parents to keep their children from viewing partial nudity if they wished. It was unexpected and should not be allowed unless the producers are willing to have their program rated for partial nudity. It is definitely not the most important issue today nor on the hot list period but it is definitely time they started enforcing fcc rules...
>
>Having said all of that I find it amazing that she is taking the majority of the slack for it and not Justin Timerlake who after all pulled off the clothing!
>
>
>
>>Dean,
>>
>>There's a store on Toronto's main drag with the letters "F", "C", "U" and "K" each about a foot (or more) tall on a big sign. It is a trademark.
>>
>>I don't know if things were visible better on HDTV, but the Janet Jackson debacle, at least as seen on live regular TV, was merely a whitish spot that suggested that the breast might be visible. How the population of the U.S. has blown that so out of proportion is something to behold!
>>
>>Now gay marriage is on the front burner. When are the PEOPLE going to get to things that are REALLY WORRISOME??? The media and your politicians can distract the PEOPLE at will. WMD non-existence is now a non-issue, loss of personal rights is now a non-issue, the pre-emption policy is now a non-issue. So many things that REALLY matter are relegated to the background for the sake of trivial matters that have little bearing on people's day-to-day lives.
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>
>>>Yes. But it was implied and expressed clearly.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Hi Elmer.
>>>>>I knew that. But I couldn't believe the "F" word went pass the screening process... if there is a screening process.
>>>>
>>>>it didn't. if you look closely you'll see the f-word was never writen.