>I don't think that the article "Technical comparison of MySQL.... vs. SQL Server 2000" is at all worthy of a spot as "news" on the UT main page!
>
>It is one big advertisement in favour of MS SQL Server disguised as an "article".
>
>I find it disappointing that such an "article" can make it to the UT Main page and urge its removal asap.
>
>Jim

Hi Jim
I am not fully agree with you.
A few week ago I past through this article, but I lost the link.
I have a customer who like my firm to re-write SQLServer2000 code in MySQL4.1. Finding this article again I show him that MySQL do not support Stored Procedures and in this case we should add a COM which to do what they do. This was not acceptable for him and he stop to bug us with this requirement.
Yes these articles sometimes looklike advertisemen, but sometimes they present weaknesses and advantages of some product.
That's why one of my favorite articles is "Choose the right Microsoft database for your development needs"
http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-6329-5056993.html
where is presented advatages of VFP versus Access