Jim,

>You have had 2 years to finish it yourself. Maybe some day you should.

Well since we are two releases beyond VFP7SP1,and will be three releases beyond it in another few months, the effort would be pretty pointless. I have better things to occupy my free time.

>Right, but you see no reason to apologize for inane behaviour on your part once the "seriously flawed" argument is found to be correct. Not a bad deal. Not my way of operating though.

I have in fact apologized to Fabio where I have made an incorrect statement. Are you saying that my statement of adequate regression testing is inane behavior? If you are speaking of something else please give an example.

By what measuring stick are you directing these charges of persecution? I mean how many people, of what group of people, can post a contrary opinion in a thread before it becomes a conspiracy?

Let me make it perfectly clear to you, I only entered this thread when Fabio called this a bug, but in fact his thread title indicates that this is an enhancement request, which in itself is fine.