Jim,

>not even reading the thread title (let alone its content) before doing so.

I had read every prior post in the thread before I made my first post, so you are quite wrong in that assumption/accusation.

>So it does sound like you saw the word "bug", saw it was FabioL

When Fabio does not accept it to be a documented behavior of the product and declared it a bug, I stepped in to disagree with that assessment.

> and decided to discharge both barrels,

that is a overreaction to my post of:

>>>>> No, it's not a bug. It is in fact an inadequate regression test of your code.