Hi John,
Good to know someone at Microsoft has looked at this tread, do you think of it as a possible ER in VFP9 ?
>This is a EULA violation. I would stongly advise you not to take that route.
>
>>
>>I hope you are able to find a resolution to your problem.
>>
>>
>>I find a solution.
>>I need to do a VFP C++ reverse engineering, and crack my runtime VFP8*.dll.
>>
>>But this is one unacceptable effort in order to correct this behaviour.
>>
>>I want VFP9 resolve it.
>>
>>If VFP9 not resolve it, i change the VFP9*.dll code.
>>
>>Fabio
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only