PMFJI but, I understand that Citrix itself has addressed this problem...
I don't have a lot of info yet since we are just beginning to build our Citrix environment, but it's a patch (FoxFix.exe) to be installed on top of Citrix WinFrame 1.7.
I can only hope that the proper technology is included in M$ Hydra's release version. Right now we are working with the Beta and results have been quite positive over the LAN. Still working on the RAS connection...
HTH
>Hi Stephanie,
>
>Yes and no. You are generally correct in saying it is a bandwidth issue. For example you are obviously going to get a faster response on a LAN using 10 - 100 MBit ethernet as compared to a 28.8 RAS connection. The main issue, in the case of VFP, is that VFP treats the entire screen as one large bitmap. Running an application on a Citrix LAN is no different than on NT or Novell as far as performance is concerned. But the main purpose of Citrix is as a thin client for remote access.This is where VFP fails, IMHO. I am hoping, and would prefer, that M$ gets their act together with Tahoe in respect to the bitmap issue, rather than me paying for more bandwidth than I really need just to accommodate VFP. HTH
>
>>Hi Rod -
>>
>>We have tested the application using the local network accessing the Citrix server and performance is quite snappy... this makes me think that the issue must be bandwidth. Do you agree?
>>
>>Thanks for you input.
>>
>>Steph
>>
>>>What is the Citrix Server. I think your problems may be in the Server rather than the line. A fast enough server should work acceptably over phone lines.
>>>
>>>Rod Lewis
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only