>We must understand what is implied in "Mr." Lula's decision (and action): if it begins this way what will come next? Remember: totalitarian regimes begin exactly this very same way...

Monkey simão (very funny guy) wrote today:

"On the opposite to expelling the NYT's journalist why he didn't cancel his subscription of NYT?"

"There is a new survey for Lula's popularity on The New York BalanTimes.." :)

>
>>If I publ. here if you Fernando really enjoy Whisky..
>
>I do enjoy drinking whisky and I do drink whisky, period.<snip>

Heeloo colleague.. :)

>The difference is that I don't owe any explanations to the nation for doing that. I'm not the president. Lula IS the president and owes explanation for his behavior, period. That's the way a real democracy is. Besides that I don't drink too much, he does.

The authorities should have acted with more sobriety.. oops I meant seriousness !
>
>Do you ignore that it's a common sense in Brazil that Lula drinks too much?
>
Do you know how Lula informed the journalist ?

Come on, time to the last drink.. :)