>>>>>Vlad
>>>>
>>>>The spirit of the message is that Access in no way has the power of VFP.
>Yes it is simpler to use but in a direct comparison I believe most 'power
>users' will choose VFP.
>>>>
>>>>As proof, look at the Jet engine as it develops & you will see more &
>more FoxPro data engine 'parts' being added to Jet. First there was
>Rushmore support & now FoxPro indexes included in Jet.
>>>
>>>I think you are right
>>> and I think that finally MS thinks so as well
>>
>>Arnon
>>
>>Glad to see you gained some knowledge while in the states! (g)
>>
>>Tom
>
>Thanks for all your advise! So, can I say that, as far as software
>development is concerned to develop solid applications, VFP
>will br the better choice as compare to Access?
>Anyone has ratio comparison for the number of VFP vs Access
>users in your particular country (pls state name of country).
>-Alvin (S'pore)
>
>.


Lets say to develop real Client/Server apps with Power -- yeah VFP. Maybe MS will have those figures but I don't have them in my back pocket right now! (s)

Tom