>>>>>>Vlad
>>>>>
>>>>>The spirit of the message is that Access in no way has the power of VFP.
>>Yes it is simpler to use but in a direct comparison I believe most 'power
>>users' will choose VFP.
>>>>>
>>>>>As proof, look at the Jet engine as it develops & you will see more &
>>more FoxPro data engine 'parts' being added to Jet. First there was
>>Rushmore support & now FoxPro indexes included in Jet.
>>>>
>>>>I think you are right
>>>> and I think that finally MS thinks so as well
>>>
>>>Arnon
>>>
>>>Glad to see you gained some knowledge while in the states! (g)
>>>
>>>Tom
>>
>>Thanks for all your advise! So, can I say that, as far as software
>>development is concerned to develop solid applications, VFP
>>will br the better choice as compare to Access?
>>Anyone has ratio comparison for the number of VFP vs Access
>>users in your particular country (pls state name of country).
>>-Alvin (S'pore)
>>
>>.
>
>
>Lets say to develop real Client/Server apps with Power -- yeah VFP. Maybe MS will have those figures but I don't have them in my back pocket right now! (s)
>
>Tom

Maybe you have them in your front pocket, have you looked ?
Alex.