>>> No server software or hardware. For my data uses, I think VFP's the best.
>
>So what you are doing is super-imposing your specific trivial requirements as a general rule. No difficulty in finding the logic flaw there....

When deciding on the best software for my data uses the consideration of my data uses is hardly a trivial requirement!

You're silly.

I've been pretty explicit that its not a general rule, and that "the best" anything lies only with subjective selection criteria. This is in contrast to you, who passes counter arguments off as a general rule.

You're a hypocrite.

>>The way you argue your points and nitpick others makes you the Michael Moore of the UT, you know.
>
>Usually, people that cannot make/defend a point will say what you say.

My point with this was that you are the typical internet troll. Something that has been done by others for a long time and something that has been done far better than you're doing it.

Something I've learned over the years is that *any* point of view may be defended or dismissed given the right amount of nitpicking, and all that it requires is some knowledge and a fair amount of stubborness.

On the other hand, if you choose to accomplish something more than the masturbatory pleasure of winning a contest in your own mind only, then you'll need engage in dialog with both wisdom and humility.

You, troll, are a child with a tool who knows its power but not its responsibility.

You're a fool.

>This reminds me of when you tried the whole "I can write a more scaleable app in Fox/DBF's than you can in SQL Server"....
>
>Now THAT was lol...

Please cite the message that contains that quote.

You're a psued.