>
Your original post did not have a high confidence level. You begged it to be disproved, I was merely reversing the responsibility of its proof.
>

You know the old saying right....don't ask a question you don't know the answer to... When necessary, I'll plead ignorance, and ask others to qualify. A good example is George Tasker clarifying that 8 RTM'd in the winter.


>>What I said is a pure statement of fact.
>
>In a negative manner.

But a fact nonetheless...

>>But that is not the point, is it? The issue has to do with what happened in the past. Whether it was an exception or not is 100% irrelevant.
>
>It's no more irrelevant than the points you raise.
>
>>Somebody else is going to have to confirm. Based on my recollection - 7 and 8 RTM's in the fall. I believe VS RTM'd in the fall as well. I believe 5 RTM'd in the fall as well (we wrote a book ). I believe 6 RTM'd in the last summer/fall as well.
>
>Again, not someone else's responsibility to prove your statement true.

But you see the difference right... When 8 RTM'd has zero to do with the issue. Whether it RTM'd in spring, summer, fall, or winter, the validity of my point is unaffected, and as a result - is still valid. That point in case you forgot is that on at least 1 prior occasion, MS HAS COMMENTED on future versions BEYOND WHAT IS CURRENTLY IN BETA.... Nothing more, nothing less...


>>No...I am just saying that when the key note comes - and nothing about 10 is said, that should be indicative of something. Conclusive??? Perhaps not. Just comparing present to history.
>
>We'll see what is said in October.

Yep....and I may even be in Vegas!!

>>Glad you see it my way Dave...
>
>*LOL* Only you could twist this around to mean that I am seeing things your way. Nice try though.

I meant with respect to keeping people honest Dave...;0