>So you are making a distinction between saying something was OK vs. Great. So in your opinion, a series on Fox/Oracle is just an "OK" idea. Not a good idea or a great idea...just an "OK" idea.
>
>That's fine...but you cannot say that you don't have an opinion, because you do. IAC, I do agree it is up to the powers that be at FoxTalk. That said, it is a bit of a farce when the power that be at FoxTalk reject content for personal reasons as opposed to something lacking technical merit.
>
>My recollection of our conversation Ken was that it was:
>
>1. A great idea and
>2. I would be a good person to do it.
>
>We'll just leave it at that.

I'm sure I did not say "great", since I am not enthusastic about Orcale. I see nothing wrong with the idea and suggestion. My opinion is that if FoxTalk readers want an article on that topic, then it should be added in some future issue. I'm sure you are a good person to write the article, but I have no idea of you are the best person out of all the candidates who could author it, and it is up to the editor and publication and not me which is the way it should be. In reality, my opinion on this counts the same as any individual subscriber to FoxTalk.