Took you long enough to figure out... lol...

The "head-in-the-sand" crowd will never accept that you can do in .net what you can do in fox, sometimes more efficiently, sometimes less efficiently.



>>>>>>>>It's also interesting that my msgs showing Kevin that VFP is much much faster than C# on dealing with data has gone never replied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I wasn't aware of any messages proving the speed differences in data-access, maybe I've totally forgotten, but I'm sure those messages didn't prove one was faster than the other, prove me wrong as my memory is not brilliant :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OK Kevin,
>>>>>>Found it.
>>>>>>Thread #861648
>>>>>>Cetin
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, I'm aware of that one, but from your message I got the impression that you claimed to have proved my tests wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kev
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm maybe my English is giving that idea. There I showed VFP was way faster than C# if coded correctly (within the context of those small test there).
>>>
>>>Oh, did you post your altered VFP code?
>>>
>>>Kev
>>
>>Not only code many messages with no reply.
>
>I refer to my last comment on this, the tests were worthless, hence why I let them die. It seems my latest attempt is going to go the same way due to so many people arguing against results they don't like to see.
>
>Kev