>Next time please put all your spam in one message, it's a little less annoying that way.

Heya Rob -
ya know ? When I procured the stack o CoDe Mags I thought I'd save folks some money - the demographic matches those who wanted the back issues. So I posted here in a Dot Net Forum on UT with the Annoucement....

Now you've dipped off into the black realm o spam . I have to ask myself - DID I SPAM THE UT for these two mag issues o CoDe ??? [my answer, of course, is a resounding NO - I listed the *TWO* issues in *TWO* - count em - *TWO* seperate posts - with *TWO* seperate URLS.

and my answer, still, to that question o SPAM [imo], is *NO* ...

If I have have offended your sensibilities somehow/what ? I offer you my deepest apologies / bow in the dust kind o thing .


But ? In The Mean Time ?

Care to Buy A Back Issue ? I apparently have some to sell...
I'll understand - really - if YOU are a developer for DOT NET, with a bend for 'it should be free, since it came from my understanding of VFP-related publications' .... alas- that opinion is flawed, IMO.

I - am NOT - a DOT NET developer. I have not sent to any clients ANY NEW Dot Net CodeBase - nor Will I Ever. In The MeanTime - I DO review tons o Dot Net CodeBase that failed for 'the implementation' . I can read da DotNet codebase and translate it back to other stuff. It's a wonderful world - dat billable time , ah ?




warmest regards [once] Bill.