Why do you assume the 2010 support date is the only information he is bringing to the meeting?

Why do you assume that there is a .Net guy lurking about it, this not in PA? Maybe there is a Linux guy lurking, maybe no one, it does not matter, it was a VFP question not a what should I use question.

I know that "supported until 2010" does help non-technical people deal with the claims from the .Net guys that VFP is dead in 1-2 years.

The point is a specific question was asked. No attempt to answer his question was given, a rational for using .Net was given.

It is easy to start a new thread.





>>
>
>Sorry, but Kevin has not hi-jacked the thread. A question was asked re: the support of VFP until 2010 or whenever. As a Fox developer as well being a .NET, SQL Server, and Oracle Developer, I can tell you that if all you have in the chamber is a reference that the product will be "supported" until 2010, the .NET guy is going to win that argument - hands down.
>
>Better for the guy to be prepared - and most likely - to lose.
>
>You guys need to get out of this dream-land that "support until 2010" is something significant that you can hang your hat on....
>
>Time to get your head - and other body parts - out of the sand...
>
>John