Does the ???? indicate a rhetorical question???? Fancy Lawyer talk????

I got my last assignment by have a well developed app written in VFP that could modified to work for the new business for a small investment. While a new system would have cost at least $500,000. It also helped that I have a diverse skill set, knows fox, and did not try to convince them that they should throw out there existing AS/400/DB2 systems because MS says .NET is the future. With VFP I was able to leverage the large investment already made in my software and with minor changes I can make use of their existing technology investmests.

But, I guess I should have thrown it all out and written it in VB.NET and SQL Server.

You assumed I was talking about creating a new system from scratch. Even if I was, a developer with the deep knowledge of a organization or industry can easily have a 10 to 1 price advantage over the consulant trying get CEO to build a new system in .NET.

Given your flawed logic, I will assume your guarantee is worth the full value of your advice.


>>
>If Fox always comes out on the short end of an arguement why is it that you are a Fox developer?
>>
>
>You know how I got my current assignment???? By being an expert level Fox developer who:
>
>1. Had a diverse skill set (technical, analytical, business, etc);
>2. Knows that Fox is a legacy technology and;
>3. Did not try to push Fox and convince the client otherwise...
>
>I am a Fox developer by virture of my experience. That said, most of what I do today is not Fox.
>
>>
>Lets say you bring a $500,000 .Net price tag and I bring a $50,000 VFP. I suppose you could counter anything but you may have a pretty weak case.
>>
>
>Flawed argument. Assuming the pricing is correct, Fox - or any other tool for that matter - does not enjoy a 10 to 1 price advantage. On that basis alone, I could easily dismantle your argument - as it is a product of a fantasy. You see...if it is truly a 500K type job, your 50K bid would NEVER be taken seriously. And, if it is a 500K job, then regardless of technology, in all material respects, that is what it will cost.
>
>>BTW what does you guarantee cover?
>
>Given your flawed example, it is not something you would have to worry about.
>
>Any more questions????
>
>John