General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
In this particular case, you had an already existing application that could be modified. Those are false economies of scale.
From your perspective, it was a good deal. From your client's standpoint, it is not so good because they are still locked into a particular technology - with a particular consultant. And likely, there will be serious scaleablity issues.
For the record, you would not need sql server if they already had db2 <s>..
John
>Does the ???? indicate a rhetorical question???? Fancy Lawyer talk????
>
>I got my last assignment by have a well developed app written in VFP that could modified to work for the new business for a small investment. While a new system would have cost at least $500,000. It also helped that I have a diverse skill set, knows fox, and did not try to convince them that they should throw out there existing AS/400/DB2 systems because MS says .NET is the future. With VFP I was able to leverage the large investment already made in my software and with minor changes I can make use of their existing technology investmests.
>
>But, I guess I should have thrown it all out and written it in VB.NET and SQL Server.
>
>You assumed I was talking about creating a new system from scratch. Even if I was, a developer with the deep knowledge of a organization or industry can easily have a 10 to 1 price advantage over the consulant trying get CEO to build a new system in .NET.
>
>Given your flawed logic, I will assume your guarantee is worth the full value of your advice.
>
>
>>>
>>If Fox always comes out on the short end of an arguement why is it that you are a Fox developer?
>>>
>>
>>You know how I got my current assignment???? By being an expert level Fox developer who:
>>
>>1. Had a diverse skill set (technical, analytical, business, etc);
>>2. Knows that Fox is a legacy technology and;
>>3. Did not try to push Fox and convince the client otherwise...
>>
>>I am a Fox developer by virture of my experience. That said, most of what I do today is not Fox.
>>
>>>
>>Lets say you bring a $500,000 .Net price tag and I bring a $50,000 VFP. I suppose you could counter anything but you may have a pretty weak case.
>>>
>>
>>Flawed argument. Assuming the pricing is correct, Fox - or any other tool for that matter - does not enjoy a 10 to 1 price advantage. On that basis alone, I could easily dismantle your argument - as it is a product of a fantasy. You see...if it is truly a 500K type job, your 50K bid would NEVER be taken seriously. And, if it is a 500K job, then regardless of technology, in all material respects, that is what it will cost.
>>
>>>BTW what does you guarantee cover?
>>
>>Given your flawed example, it is not something you would have to worry about.
>>
>>Any more questions????
>>
>>John
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only