Hi mark,

>Let me swing the pendulum back to the other extreme here just for argument sake ---

>>This also is fed, by the fact he continues to bash VFP and promote .NET while he choosed another profession. WHAT THE HELL IS HE DOING UP HERE THEN?

>This does not rise to the level of "bannishment" offenses so what relevance is this?

My message is not any justification of John bannishment, but rather a defence on the personal attack towards me. I found a reference to me in the same message as a complaint about johns bannishment. And as I stated I don't have anything to do with his bannishment.

John is a big boy and he got bannished on something he did and is responsible for. Therefore any references to my messages in communication with John is inappropriate. I could not say anything on the UT that caused JVPs bannishment.

>>JVP admitted in a thread he is no .NET expert, so you'll have to ask the question in how much he can set himself as an authority. somthing beeing correct is only applicable in the context they are written. I won't argue that some of his statements are correct, but they often are misleading or either just plain incomplete or incorrect.

>If this is part of any justification for a bannishment, then half the members of UT would have to go. I am a .NET idiot so does that mean I can not participate in the .NET forum if I happen by some miracle to know the answer to a question?

It is not, it is a part of my defense upon the argument that I don't know squad about .NET and I have zero credibility.

>>As JVP did many times here. You don't have to guess, it is already here on the UT.

>Since he "served his time" before, what caused his previous bannishment should have ZERO to do with any subsequent actions by the UT.

I was not refering to his former bannishment, but rather to kevins statement I can probably guess what the reactions would be if multiple messages were posted that incorrectly reported VFP’s capabilities.


>Can EVERYONE who "debated" JVP over the past however many weeks say they are 100% clean of not contributing to JVPs demise? How many threads were STARTED with JVP in the title in an effort to personally attack him? Have the starters of those threads been bannished?

Anyone who did not ask for JVPs bannishment is clean. I've never asked for it, nor publically nor privately. For the rest it is his own stance that caused its demise. What ever I write could/should not have anything to do with his demise. If I flame, it is his responsibility not to flame or not. And I dismiss anyone that holds me even partly responsible for that.

Walter,